I estimate welfare benefits of eliminating idiosyncratic consumption shocks unrelated to the business cycle as 47.3% of household utility and benefits of eliminating idiosyncratic shocks related to the business cycle as 3.4% of utility. Estimates of the former substantially exceed earlier ones because I distinguish between idiosyncratic shocks related/unrelated to the business cycle, estimate the negative skewness of shocks, target moments of idiosyncratic shocks from household-level CEX data, and target market moments. Benefits of eliminating aggregate shocks are 7.7% of utility. Policy should focus on insuring idiosyncratic shocks unrelated to the business cycle, such as the death of a household’s prime wage earner and job layoffs not necessarily related to recessions.

More on this topic

BFI Working Paper·May 7, 2025

Natural Language Equilibrium I: Off-Path Conventions

Phil Reny
Topics: Uncategorized
BFI Working Paper·Apr 22, 2025

The Law and Economics of Lawyers: Evidence from the Revolving Door in China’s Judicial System

John Zhuang Liu, Wenwei Peng, Shaoda Wang, and Daniel Xu
Topics: Uncategorized
BFI Working Paper·Apr 14, 2025

Paths to the Periphery

James Robinson
Topics: Uncategorized