Research / BFI Working PaperMar 01, 2021

What Marginal Outcome Tests Can Tell Us About Racially Biased Decision-Making

Peter Hull

Marginal outcome tests compare the expected effects of a decision on individuals who are of different races but at the same indifference point of the decision-maker. I present a simple formalization of how such tests can detect racial bias, defined as a deviation from accurate statistical discrimination. Namely, the tests can reject that the decision-maker ranks individuals according to some accurate prediction of a mandated outcome, given some unspecified race-inclusive information set. The frontier of marginal effects can furthermore rule out canonical taste-based discrimination. I relate this analysis to other interpretations of marginal outcome tests, other notions of racial discrimination, and recent identification strategies.

More Research From These Scholars

BFI Working Paper Jul 22, 2020

Mortality Effects and Choice Across Private Health Insurance Plans

Jason Abaluck, Mauricio Caceres Bravo, Peter Hull, Amanda Starc
Topics:  Health care
BFI Working Paper Dec 21, 2020

Measuring Racial Discrimination in Algorithms

David Arnold, Will Dobbie, Peter Hull
Topics:  Technology & Innovation
BFI Working Paper Oct 15, 2020

Measuring Racial Discrimination in Bail Decisions

David Arnold, Will Dobbie, Peter Hull
Topics:  Uncategorized