We study the distributional effects of remote learning using a novel approach that combines preference data from a conjoint survey experiment with administrative records of student outcomes. The experimentally derived preference data allow us to account for selection into remote learning while also studying selection patterns and treatment effect heterogeneity. We validate the approach using random variation from school choice lotteries. Our analysis of the average impacts of remote learning finds negative effects on reading (–0.13σ) and math (–0.14σ) achievement. Notably, we find evidence of positive learning effects for children whose parents have the strongest demand for remote learning. Parental concerns related to bullying appear to be an important driver of the demand for remote learning. Moreover, we find that across-the-board positive impacts of remote learning on bullying outcomes operate as a compensating differential for negative impacts on learning. Our results suggest that an important subset of students who currently sort into post-pandemic remote learning benefit from expanded choice.

More on this topic

BFI Working Paper·May 13, 2024

What Went Wrong with Federal Student Loans?

Adam Looney and Constantine Yannelis
Topics: K-12 Education
BFI Working Paper·Sep 8, 2023

From Retributive to Restorative: An Alternative Approach to Justice in Schools

Anjali Adukia, Benjamin Feigenberg, and Fatemeh Momeni
Topics: K-12 Education
BFI Working Paper·Aug 29, 2023

Disentangling Motivation and Study Productivity as Drivers of Human Capital Formation: Evidence from a Field Experiment and Structural Analysis

Christopher S. Cotton, Brent R. Hickman, John List, Joseph Price, and Sutanuka Roy
Topics: Early Childhood Education, K-12 Education