Scientists believe significant climate change is unavoidable without a drastic reduction in the emissions of greenhouse gases from the combustion of fossil fuels. However, few countries have implemented comprehensive policies that price this externality or devote serious resources to developing low carbon energy sources. In many respects, the world is betting that we will greatly reduce the use of fossil fuels because we will run out of inexpensive fossil fuels (i.e., decreases in supply) and/or technological advances will lead to the discovery of less expensive low carbon technologies (i.e., decreases in demand). The historical record indicates that the supply of fossil fuels has consistently increased over time and that their relative price advantage over low carbon energy sources has not declined substantially over time. Without robust efforts to correct the market failures around greenhouse gases, relying on supply and/or demand forces to limit greenhouse gas emissions is relying heavily on hope.

More on this topic

BFI Working Paper·Jul 10, 2024

Destabilizing Digital “Bank Walks”

Naz Koont, Tano Santos and Luigi Zingales
Topics: Monetary Policy
BFI Working Paper·Jul 8, 2024

Who Pays for Rising Health Care Prices? Evidence from Hospital Mergers

Zarek Brot-Goldberg, Zack Cooper, Stuart V. Craig, Lev R. Klarnet, Ithai Lurie and Corbin L. Miller
Topics: Health care
BFI Working Paper·Jul 2, 2024

Is Workplace Temperature a Valuable Job Amenity? Implications for Climate Change

Ashwin Rode, Rachel E. Baker, Tamma Carleton, Anthony Louis D'Agostino, Michael Delgado, Timothy Foreman, Diana R. Gergel, Michael Greenstone, Trevor Houser, Solomon Hsiang, Andrew Hultgren, Amir Jina, Robert E. Kopp, Steven B. Malevich, Kelly E. McCusker, Ishan Nath, Matthew Pecenco, James Rising and Jiacan Yuan
Topics: Energy & Environment