Scientists believe significant climate change is unavoidable without a drastic reduction in the emissions of greenhouse gases from the combustion of fossil fuels. However, few countries have implemented comprehensive policies that price this externality or devote serious resources to developing low carbon energy sources. In many respects, the world is betting that we will greatly reduce the use of fossil fuels because we will run out of inexpensive fossil fuels (i.e., decreases in supply) and/or technological advances will lead to the discovery of less expensive low carbon technologies (i.e., decreases in demand). The historical record indicates that the supply of fossil fuels has consistently increased over time and that their relative price advantage over low carbon energy sources has not declined substantially over time. Without robust efforts to correct the market failures around greenhouse gases, relying on supply and/or demand forces to limit greenhouse gas emissions is relying heavily on hope.

More Research From These Scholars

BFI Working Paper Jun 1, 2015

Do Energy Efficiency Investments Deliver? Evidence from the Weatherization Assistance Program

Michael Greenstone, Meredith Fowlie, Catherine Wolfram
Topics:  Energy & Environment, Health care
BFI Working Paper Aug 12, 2019

Valuing the Global Mortality Consequences of Climate Change Accounting for Adaptation Costs and Benefits

Tamma Carleton, Michael Delgado, Michael Greenstone, Trevor Houser, Solomon Hsiang, Andrew Hultgren, Amir Jina, Robert Kopp, Kelly McCusker, Ishan Nath, James Rising, Ashwin Rode, Samuel Seo, Justin Simcock, Arvid Viaene, Jiacan Yuan, Alice Zhang
Topics:  Energy & Environment, Tax & Budget
BFI Working Paper Sep 2, 2017

Crude by Rail, Option Value, and Pipeline Investment

Thomas Covert, Ryan Kellogg
Topics:  Energy & Environment