This paper examines intergenerational mobility in China and Russia during their transitions from central planning to market systems. We consider mobility as movement captured by changes in status between parents and children. We provide estimates of overall mobility, which involves mobility during transition to a system’s steady state, as well as steady state mobility, which captures long-run mobility independent of transitional dynamics or shifts in the marginal distribution of outcomes across generations. We further decompose overall mobility into structural and exchange components. We find that China exhibits more overall educational mobility than Russia mostly due to greater structural mobility, while Russia exhibits greater steady state educational mobility. In contrast, both the overall and steady state occupational mobility is similar in China and Russia. Comparing these results to the US, we find that steady state mobility in education is substantially higher in the US and Russia compared to China, but occupational steady state mobility is comparable in all three countries.

More on this topic

BFI Working Paper·Aug 31, 2026

Democratizing Private Markets: Equilibrium Predictions

Lubos Pastor, Robert F. Stambaugh, and Lucian A. Taylor
Topics: Financial Markets
BFI Working Paper·Jul 28, 2026

Reserves and the Buyer of Last Resort

Frédéric Boissay and Harald Uhlig
Topics: Financial Markets
BFI Working Paper·Jul 15, 2026

Supply and Demand with Market Heterogeneity

Ingvil Gaarder, Lancelot Henry de Frahan, Magne Mogstad, Alexander Torgovitsky, and Oscar Volpe
Topics: Financial Markets