We systematically review studies of how unemployment benefits affect unemployment duration. Statistically significant findings are eleven times more likely to be published. Correcting for publication bias reduces average elasticity by a factor of two. Meta-analysis provides a principled way for sufficient statistics methods to aggregate estimates across policy contexts and speak to the optimality of large reforms. Although existing consumption drop-based approaches typically imply an optimal replacement rate near zero, our corrected estimates imply an optimal replacement rate of 28%. The “micro” elasticity is equal to the “macro” elasticity, suggesting that general equilibrium effects are unimportant or cancel out.

More on this topic

BFI Working Paper·Nov 14, 2024

Assortative Matching and Wages: The Role of Selection

Katarína Borovičková and Robert Shimer
Topics: Employment & Wages
BFI Working Paper·Sep 24, 2024

Moving to Opportunity, Together

Seema Jayachandran, Lea Nassal, Matthew J. Notowidigdo, Marie Paul, Heather Sarsons, and Elin Sundberg
Topics: Employment & Wages
BFI Working Paper·Sep 16, 2024

Why Do Workers Dislike Inflation? Wage Erosion and Conflict Costs

Joao Guerreiro, Jonathon Hazell, Chen Lian, and Christina Patterson
Topics: Employment & Wages