How do agents respond to policy when investments have high up-front costs and lasting payoffs? We estimate farmers’ short- and long-run responses to changes in groundwater pumping costs in California—where perennial crops with these features are prevalent—using both fixed effects and dynamic discrete choice models that leverage quasi-experimental variation. In the short run, farmers’ groundwater demand elasticity is −0.76, and they do not change crops. In contrast, the long-run elasticity is −0.38, driven in part by meaningful reductions in water-intensive perennial cropping. Meeting California’s sustainability targets would require reallocation of 9% of acres, including a 50% increase in fallowing.

More on this topic

BFI Working Paper·Apr 15, 2025

Can Pollution Markets Work in Developing Countries? Experimental Evidence from India

Michael Greenstone, Rohini Pande, Nicholas Ryan, and Anant Sudarshan
Topics: Energy & Environment
BFI Working Paper·Mar 10, 2025

The Value of Clean Water: Experimental Evidence from Rural India

Fiona Burlig, Amir Jina, and Anant Sudarshan
Topics: Development Economics, Energy & Environment
BFI Working Paper·Jan 28, 2025

Drive Down the Cost: Learning by Doing and Government Policies in the Global EV Battery Industry

Panle Jia Barwick, Hyuk-soo Kwon, Shanjun Li Nahim, and Bin Zahur
Topics: Energy & Environment, Technology & Innovation