This paper investigates household preferences over who should work and whether these preferences are malleable. We document that men and women prefer that husbands work over wives. To understand why, we randomly assign a six-week job to either the husband or wife and document asymmetry: women’s work improves their own wellbeing but not their husbands’, while men’s work improves both partners’ wellbeing. One year later, we surprise households with a work opportunity. Both women and men in households where women were previously employed are more likely to prefer the woman take the job and express fewer concerns about women’s employment in general.

More on this topic

BFI Working Paper·Aug 12, 2026

Sticky Wage Norms and the Real Wage Cost of Unexpected Inflation

Erik Hurst, Christina Patterson, Nela Richardson, and Ye Liv Wang
Topics: Employment & Wages
BFI Working Paper·Jun 30, 2026

The Effect of Reminders for Self-Set Goals on Productivity

Martin Abel, Tomoko Harigaya, Michael Kremer, and Jessica Zhu
Topics: Development Economics, Employment & Wages
BFI Working Paper·Jun 23, 2026

An Informational Rationale for Viewpoint Neutrality in Education

Georgy Egorov and Konstantin Sonin
Topics: Higher Education & Workforce Training