In turbulent times, political labels become increasingly uninformative about politicians’ true policy preferences or their ability to withstand the influence of special interest groups. We offer a model in which politicians use campaign rhetoric to signal their political preferences in multiple dimensions. In equilibrium, the less popular types try to pool with the more popular ones, whereas the more popular types seek to separate themselves. The ability of voters to process information shapes politicians’ campaign rhetoric. If the signals on the cultural dimension are more precise, politicians signal more there, even if the economy is more im-portant to voters. The unpopular type benefits from increased conformity, which bridges the candidates’ rhetoric and makes it more difficult for voters to make an informed decision.

More on this topic

BFI Working Paper·Feb 2, 2026

Diversionary Escalation: Theory and Evidence from Eastern Ukraine

Natalie Ayers, Christopher W. Blair, Joseph J. Ruggiero, Konstantin Sonin, and Austin Wright
Topics: Uncategorized
BFI Working Paper·Jan 26, 2026

Never Enough: Dynamic Status Incentives in Organizations

Leonardo Bursztyn, Ewan Rawcliffe, and Hans-Joachim Voth
Topics: Uncategorized
BFI Working Paper·Jan 21, 2026

Rational Disagreement

Nabil I. Al-Najjar and Harald Uhlig
Topics: Uncategorized