As of July 2026, 23 states had approved policies that disallow spending of SNAP benefits on sugary drinks. The effects of such restrictions on consumption are unclear, however, since most households can simply switch to buying sugary drinks with non-SNAP funds. Using a difference-in- differences design with nationwide grocery purchase panel data, we estimate that restrictions in the first 10 states reduced the average SNAP household’s retail purchases of excluded drinks by 12.4 percent (standard error = 1.0) over the first half of 2026. In states that excluded only some sugary drinks, SNAP households partially substituted to non-excluded drinks. Surveys we carried out before and after implementation show that the restrictions increased SNAP recipients’ perceptions of stigma. We combine our estimated consumption reductions with external parameters to model welfare effects given an over-consumption internality and a fiscal externality via public health care spending. In our model, excluding all sugary drinks from SNAP nationwide would provide benefits of about $1.1 billion per year, of which about 70 percent is from reduced health care costs.

More on this topic

BFI Working Paper·Oct 9, 2026

The Gendered Impacts of Perceived Skin Tone: Evidence from African American Siblings in 1870–1940

Ran Abramitzky, Jacob Conway, Roy Mill, and Luke C.D. Stein
Topics: Economic Mobility & Poverty, Employment & Wages
BFI Working Paper·Oct 6, 2026

Provider and Worker Responses to Supply-Side Audits in Social Insurance

Pablo A. Celhay, Nicolás Figueroa, Carla Guadalupi, and Benjamín Oteíza
Topics: Health care
BFI Working Paper·Sep 14, 2026

How Disability Benefits in Early Life Affect Adult Outcomes

Manasi Deshpande, Alessandra Voena, and Jason B. Weitze
Topics: Economic Mobility & Poverty, Employment & Wages