Female labor force participation remains lower than male participation in many settings. Can this be explained by households’ preference for men’s work, and are these preferences malleable? We address this question with a field experiment in a refugee camp setting in Bangladesh, where we randomly offer the same six-week job—under identical conditions—to either the husband or the wife in a household. We find that when women work, their wellbeing improves but their husbands’ does not. When men work, both their own and their wives’ wellbeing improve, along with the health of the relationship and a greater self-reported sense of purpose for both partners. These findings help shed light on why households favor men working over women, which we document through an incentivized labor supply exercise. However, more than a year later, households where women previously worked for us show significantly stronger preferences for female employment, as men update their beliefs about the costs of women working. These results demonstrate that even brief exposure to women’s work can shift household preferences over female employment.

More on this topic

BFI Working Paper·Feb 10, 2026

The Effect of Exposure: Evidence from Spatial Choices in Nairobi

Joshua Dean, Gabriel Kreindler, and Oluchi Mbonu
Topics: Employment & Wages
BFI Working Paper·Feb 2, 2026

Managers and the Cultural Transmission of Gender Norms

Virginia Minni, Kieu-Trang Nguyen, Heather Sarsons, and Carla Srebot
Topics: Employment & Wages
BFI Working Paper·Jan 26, 2026

Occupation-Specific Education Requirements and Occupational Silos: Evidence from CPA Licensing Rules

Anthony Le and Parth Shah
Topics: Economic Mobility & Poverty, Employment & Wages