We study the impacts of a reform to parole supervision in Illinois. The reform reduced the term of supervision for some parolees from 12 months to 6 months while many similar parolees continued to receive 12 months of supervision. We evaluate the impact of the reform using a standard difference-in-differences estimator, and we find clear evidence that the reform reduced prison re-entry rates. Sharp drops in rates of technical revocations drove these reductions. Rates of prison re-admissions linked to new crimes did not change. We merge data from Cook County Courts with our data on state prison admissions and releases, and we find no evidence that the reform increased crime rates among parolees. The reform reduced both the cost of incarceration and the cost of parolee supervision without creating harms to public safety.

More on this topic

BFI Working Paper·Jan 9, 2026

The Lending Technology of Direct Lenders in Private Credit

Young Soo Jang, Dasol Kim, and Amir Sufi
Topics: Fiscal Studies
BFI Working Paper·Jan 7, 2026

A World Trading System For Whom? Evidence from Global Tariffs

Rodrigo Adão, John Sturm Becko, Arnaud Costinot, and Dave Donaldson
Topics: Economic Mobility & Poverty, Employment & Wages
BFI Working Paper·Jan 5, 2026

The Labor Market Return to Permanent Residency

Kory Kroft, Isaac Norwich, Matthew Notowidigdo, and Stephen Tino
Topics: Economic Mobility & Poverty, Employment & Wages