We examine the social construction of race in the United States, from Reconstruction to the modern day, and show how this affects statistical differences across and within racial categories. During the Reconstruction era, people with the same light brown skin tones, recorded by the Freedman’s Bank (1865-1874), were more likely racialized as White or Mulatto in the 1870 Census if they were wealthier or literate. Racial assignment of descendants remained fluid through the 1940 Census. In modern data, self-reported race also varies with income and college completion among people with light brown skin tones. This endogenous racial assignment increases cross-race wealth gaps, which we show can be adjusted using sub-samples with data on skin tone or ancestry. Endogenous race also induces selection when controlling for race that, for example, attenuates the relationship between wealth and skin tone.

More on this topic

BFI Working Paper·Mar 20, 2026

Does Scarcity Tax Parents’ Minds?

Ariel Kalil and Mauricio Koechlin
Topics: Early Childhood Education, Economic Mobility & Poverty
BFI Working Paper·Mar 17, 2026

Household Preferences for Women’s Employment: A Field Experiment in Bangladesh

Yueh-ya Hsu, Reshmaan N. Hussam, Erin M. Kelley, and Gregory Lane
Topics: Economic Mobility & Poverty, Employment & Wages, Higher Education & Workforce Training
BFI Working Paper·Feb 16, 2026

Income Shocks and the Intergenerational Transmission of Executive Function

Ariel Kalil and Mauricio Koechlin
Topics: Early Childhood Education, Economic Mobility & Poverty