The classic literature argues that a large middle class is a prerequisite for economic development. Is this true when AI progress threatens to disrupt the labor market? On the one hand, uncertainty about the consequences can impede the passage of AI-friendly regulation: voters fear the prospect of losing when the uncertainty is resolved. On the other, granular information about reformconsequences may reduce political support as well. In our model, a larger middle class hampers reform, compensatory redistribution is most politically effective when its welfare justification is weakest, and AI regulatory sandboxes encounter resistance because new information undermines reformcoalitions

More on this topic

BFI Working Paper·Oct 6, 2026

Do AI Assistants Reinforce Investor Beliefs? Evidence from Human and AI Replies

Swaminathan Balasubramaniam, Jorge Sabat, and Soumyajit Ray
Topics: Technology & Innovation
BFI Working Paper·Oct 6, 2026

Capital-Skill Complementarity Beyond Firm Boundaries

Gert Bijnens, Anders Humlum, and Stijn Vanormelingen
Topics: Employment & Wages, Technology & Innovation
BFI Working Paper·Oct 6, 2026

Aligning Platform and User Incentives in Social Media Age Restrictions

Leonardo Bursztyn, Rafael Jiménez-Durán, Aaron Leonard, Filip Milojević, and Christopher Roth
Topics: Technology & Innovation