How costly is inflation to workers? Answers to this question have focused on the path of real wages during inflationary periods. We argue that workers must take costly actions (“conflict”) to have nominal wages catch up with inflation, meaning there are welfare costs even if real wages do not fall as inflation rises. We study a menu-cost style model, where workers choose whether to engage in conflict with employers to secure a wage increase. We show that, following a rise in inflation, wage catchup resulting from more frequent conflict does not raise welfare. Instead, the impact of inflation on worker welfare is determined by what we term “wage erosion”—how inflation would lower real wages if workers’ conflict decisions did not respond to inflation. As a result, measuring welfare using observed wage growth understates the costs of inflation. We conduct a survey showing that workers are willing to sacrifice 1.75% of their wages to avoid conflict. Calibrating the model to the survey data, the aggregate costs of inflation incorporating conflict more than double the costs of inflation via falling real wages alone.

More on this topic

BFI Working Paper·Jun 7, 2025

The Local Root of Wage Inequality

Hugo Lhuillier
Topics: Employment & Wages
BFI Working Paper·Jun 5, 2025

Firm Premia and Match Effects in Pay vs. Amenities

Anders Humlum, Mette Rasmussen, and Evan K. Rose
Topics: Employment & Wages
BFI Working Paper·May 19, 2025

Remote Work, Employee Mix, and Performance

Cevat Giray Aksoy, Nicholas Bloom, Steven Davis, Victoria Marino, and Cem Özgüzel
Topics: Employment & Wages