How costly is inflation to workers? Answers to this question have focused on the path of real wages during inflationary periods. We argue that workers must take costly actions (“conflict”) to have nominal wages catch up with inflation, meaning there are welfare costs even if real wages do not fall as inflation rises. We study a menu-cost style model, where workers choose whether to engage in conflict with employers to secure a wage increase. We show that, following a rise in inflation, wage catchup resulting from more frequent conflict does not raise welfare. Instead, the impact of inflation on worker welfare is determined by what we term “wage erosion”—how inflation would lower real wages if workers’ conflict decisions did not respond to inflation. As a result, measuring welfare using observed wage growth understates the costs of inflation. We conduct a survey showing that workers are willing to sacrifice 1.75% of their wages to avoid conflict. Calibrating the model to the survey data, the aggregate costs of inflation incorporating conflict more than double the costs of inflation via falling real wages alone.

More on this topic

BFI Working Paper·Sep 24, 2024

Moving to Opportunity, Together

Seema Jayachandran, Lea Nassal, Matthew J. Notowidigdo, Marie Paul, Heather Sarsons, and Elin Sundberg
Topics: Employment & Wages
BFI Working Paper·Aug 15, 2024

Disemployment Effects of Unemployment Insurance: A Meta-Analysis

Jonathan Cohen and Peter Ganong
Topics: Employment & Wages
BFI Working Paper·Jul 29, 2024

Incentives and Habit Formation in Health Screenings: Evidence from the Illinois Workplace Wellness Study

Damon Jones, David Molitor, and Julian Reif
Topics: Employment & Wages, Health care