We study the labor market impacts of retroactively reducing felonies to misdemeanors in San Joaquin County, CA, where criminal justice agencies implemented Proposition 47 reductions in a quasi-random order, without requiring input or action from affected individuals. Linking records of reductions to administrative tax data, we find employment benefits for individuals who (likely) requested their reduction, consistent with selection, but no benefits among the larger subset of individuals whose records were reduced proactively. A field experiment notifying a subset of individuals about their proactive reduction also shows null results, implying that lack of awareness is unlikely to explain our findings.

More on this topic

BFI Working Paper·Nov 25, 2025

Paternalistic Social Assistance: Evidence and Implications from Cash vs. In-Kind Transfers

Anna Chorniy, Amy Finkelstein, and Matthew Notowidigdo
Topics: Economic Mobility & Poverty
BFI Working Paper·Oct 7, 2025

Tapping Business and Household Surveys to Sharpen Our View of Work from Home

José María Barrero, Nicholas Bloom, Kathryn Bonney, Cory Breaux, Catherine Buffington, Steven J. Davis, Lucia Foster, Brian McKenzie, Keith Savage, and Cristina Tello-Trillo
Topics: Employment & Wages
BFI Working Paper·Sep 18, 2025

The Five Shanghai Themes

Harald Uhlig
Topics: Economic Mobility & Poverty, Energy & Environment, Financial Markets, Health care