In high-dimensional regression scenarios with low signal-to-noise ratios, we assess the predictive performance of several machine learning algorithms. Theoretical insights show Ridge regression’s superiority in exploiting weak signals, surpassing a zero benchmark. In contrast, Lasso fails to exceed this baseline, indicating its learning limitations. Simulations reveal that Random Forest generally outperforms Gradient Boosted Regression Trees when signals are weak. Moreover, Neural Networks with ℓ2-regularization excel in capturing nonlinear functions of weak signals. Our empirical analysis across six economic datasets suggests that the weakness of signals, not necessarily the absence of sparsity, may be Lasso’s major limitation in economic predictions.

More on this topic

BFI Working Paper·Jun 23, 2026

Misleading Estimates from Nonlinear Models with a Binary Outcome

Brian Curran, Bruce Meyer, and Derek Wu
Topics: Uncategorized
BFI Working Paper·Jun 15, 2026

Don’t Give Up on Lab Experiments: Why the Field Still Needs the Lab

John List
Topics: Uncategorized
BFI Working Paper·May 5, 2026

Retrospective Versus Prospective Meritocracy

Steven Durlauf
Topics: Uncategorized