This paper examines intergenerational mobility in China and Russia during their transitions from central planning to market systems. We consider mobility as movement captured by changes in status between parents and children. We provide estimates of overall mobility, which involves mobility during transition to a system’s steady state, as well as steady state mobility, which captures long-run mobility independent of transitional dynamics or shifts in the marginal distribution of outcomes across generations. We further decompose overall mobility into structural and exchange components. We find that China exhibits more overall educational mobility than Russia mostly due to greater structural mobility, while Russia exhibits greater steady state educational mobility. In contrast, both the overall and steady state occupational mobility is similar in China and Russia. Comparing these results to the US, we find that steady state mobility in education is substantially higher in the US and Russia compared to China, but occupational steady state mobility is comparable in all three countries.

More on this topic

BFI Working Paper·Sep 23, 2025

Dynamic Competition for Sleepy Deposits

Mark L. Egan, Ali Hortaçsu, Nathan A. Kaplan, Adi Sunderam, and Vincent Yao
Topics: Financial Markets
BFI Working Paper·Sep 18, 2025

The Five Shanghai Themes

Harald Uhlig
Topics: Economic Mobility & Poverty, Energy & Environment, Financial Markets, Health care
BFI Working Paper·Aug 7, 2025

Nonlinear Micro Income Processes with Macro Shocks

Martín Almuzara, Manuel Arellano, Richard Blundell, and Stéphane Bonhomme
Topics: Employment & Wages, Financial Markets