Personalizing policies can theoretically increase their effectiveness. However, personalization is difficult when individual types are unobservable and the preferences of policymakers and individuals are not aligned, which could cause individuals to misreport their type. Mechanism design offers a strategy to overcome this issue: offer an “incentive-compatible” menu of policy choices designed to induce participants to select the variant intended for their type. Using a field experiment that personalized incentives for exercise among 6,800 adults with diabetes and hypertension in urban India, we show that personalizing with an incentive-compatible choice menu substantially improves program performance, increasing the treatment effect of incentives on exercise by 80% without increasing program costs relative to a one-size-fits-all benchmark. Mechanism design achieves similar performance to personalizing with an extensive set of observable variables, but without the high data requirements or the risk that participants might manipulate their observables.

More on this topic

BFI Working Paper·Sep 18, 2025

The Five Shanghai Themes

Harald Uhlig
Topics: Economic Mobility & Poverty, Energy & Environment, Financial Markets, Health care
BFI Working Paper·Aug 13, 2025

Post-Roe Planning: The Effect of Dobbs v. Jackson on Contraceptive and Sterilization Choices

Yana Gallen and Daisy Lu
Topics: Health care
BFI Working Paper·Aug 7, 2025

Pharmacy Benefit Managers and Vertical Relationships in Drug Supply

Zarek Brot-Goldberg, Catherine Che, and Benjamin Handel
Topics: Health care