Output-based carbon regulations—such as fuel economy standards and the rate- based standards in the Clean Power Plan—create well-known incentives to inefficiently increase output. Similar distortions are created by attribute-based regulations. This paper demonstrates that, despite these distortions, output and attribute-based standards can always yield greater expected welfare than “flat” emission standards given uncertainty in demand for output (or attributes), assuming locally constant marginal damages. For fuel economy standards, the welfare-maximizing amount of attribute or mileage-basing is likely small relative to current policy. For the electricity sector, however, an intensity standard may yield greater expected welfare than a flat standard.

More on this topic

BFI Working Paper·Oct 21, 2026

Green Subsidies with Demand Distortions

Susanna B. Berkouwer and Joshua Dean
Topics: Energy & Environment
BFI Working Paper·Sep 16, 2026

Evaluating the Spatial Consequences of a Climate Tipping Point

José-Luis Cruz, Klaus Desmet, and Esteban Rossi-Hansberg
Topics: Energy & Environment
BFI Working Paper·Jun 18, 2026

Paying for Power

Fiona Burlig and Anant Sudarshan
Topics: Energy & Environment