Competition in health insurance markets may fail to improve health outcomes if consumers are not willing to pay for high quality plans. We document large differences in the mortality rates of Medicare Advantage (MA) plans within local markets. We then show that when high (low) mortality plans exit these markets, enrollees tend to switch to more typical plans and subsequently experience lower (higher) mortality. We develop a framework that uses this variation to estimate the relationship between observed mortality rates and causal mortality effects; we find a tight link. We then extend the framework to study other predictors of mortality effects and estimate consumer willingness to pay. Higher spending plans tend to reduce enrollee mortality, but existing quality ratings are uncorrelated with plan mortality effects. Consumers place little weight on mortality effects when choosing plans. Moving beneficiaries out of the bottom 5% of plans could save tens of thousands of elderly lives each year.

More on this topic

BFI Working Paper·Oct 21, 2026

The Impact of the Great Recession on Mortality: A Dynamic Factor Analysis

Amy Finkelstein, Matthew Notowidigdo, and Enzo Profili
Topics: Health care
BFI Working Paper·Oct 12, 2026

Gains from Trade in Gun Policy: A Compensation-Based Benchmark

Brad Shapiro, Sara Drango, and Sarah Moshary
Topics: Fiscal Studies, Health care
BFI Working Paper·Oct 6, 2026

Provider and Worker Responses to Supply-Side Audits in Social Insurance

Pablo A. Celhay, Nicolás Figueroa, Carla Guadalupi, and Benjamín Oteíza
Topics: Health care