To design premium subsidies in a health insurance market, it is necessary to estimate consumer demand, cost, and study how different subsidy schemes affect insurer’s incentives. I combine data on household-level enrollment and plan-level claims from the California Affordable Care Act insurance exchange with a model of insurance demand and insurers’ competition to assess equilibrium outcomes under alternative subsidy designs. I estimate that younger households are significantly more price sensitive and cheaper to cover. Consequently, counterfactuals show that providing more generous subsidies to this group leads to equilibria where all buyers are better off and per-person public spending is lower.

More on this topic

BFI Working Paper·May 18, 2026

Proposed Mergers Where Efficiencies Are Needed Most Might Be the Least Likely to Deliver Them

Robert D. Metcalfe, Alexandre B. Sollaci, and Chad Syverson
Topics: Industrial Organization
BFI Working Paper·Mar 31, 2026

Salience and (Non-)Buyer’s Remorse: Optimal Nonlinear Pricing with Cognitively Constrained Consumers

Aaron L. Bodoh-Creed, Brent R. Hickman, John List, Ian Muir, and Gregory K. Sun
Topics: Industrial Organization
BFI Working Paper·Mar 20, 2026

Physician Competition: Entry and Substitution

Joshua Gottlieb and Sean Nicholson
Topics: Employment & Wages, Health care