Many jurisdictions levy sizable fines and fees (legal financial obligations, or LFOs) on criminal defendants. Proponents argue LFOs are a “tax on crime” that funds courts and provides deterrence; opponents argue they do neither. We examine the fiscal implications of lowering LFOs. Incentives to default generate a “Laffer” curve with revenue eventually decreasing in LFOs. Using detailed administrative data, however, we find few defendants demonstrably on the right-hand side of the curve. Those who are tend to be poor, Black, and charged with felonies. As a result, decreasing LFOs for the average defendant would come at substantial cost to governments.

More on this topic

BFI Working Paper·Jan 21, 2026

Business Concentration around the World: 1900-2020

Yueran Ma, Mengdi Zhang, and Kaspar Zimmermann
Topics: Economic Mobility & Poverty, Employment & Wages
BFI Working Paper·Jan 7, 2026

The Impacts of Parole Supervision

Luke Brinkman, Andrew Jordan, and Derek Neal
Topics: Economic Mobility & Poverty, Fiscal Studies
BFI Working Paper·Jan 7, 2026

A World Trading System For Whom? Evidence from Global Tariffs

Rodrigo Adão, John Sturm Becko, Arnaud Costinot, and Dave Donaldson
Topics: Economic Mobility & Poverty, Employment & Wages