We examine the social construction of race in the United States, from Reconstruction to the modern day, and show how this affects statistical differences across and within racial categories. During the Reconstruction era, people with the same light brown skin tones, recorded by the Freedman’s Bank (1865-1874), were more likely racialized as White or Mulatto in the 1870 Census if they were wealthier or literate. Racial assignment of descendants remained fluid through the 1940 Census. In modern data, self-reported race also varies with income and college completion among people with light brown skin tones. This endogenous racial assignment increases cross-race wealth gaps, which we show can be adjusted using sub-samples with data on skin tone or ancestry. Endogenous race also induces selection when controlling for race that, for example, attenuates the relationship between wealth and skin tone.

More on this topic

BFI Working Paper·Sep 14, 2026

How Disability Benefits in Early Life Affect Adult Outcomes

Manasi Deshpande, Alessandra Voena, and Jason B. Weitze
Topics: Economic Mobility & Poverty, Employment & Wages
BFI Working Paper·Aug 24, 2026

The Effects of SNAP Sugary Drink Restrictions on Consumption and Welfare

Hunt Allcott, Amy Finkelstein, Anna Grummon, and Matthew Notowidigdo
Topics: Economic Mobility & Poverty, Health care
BFI Working Paper·Jun 8, 2026

Intergenerational Mobility in Late Qing Dynasty: Evidence from Northeast China

Kristina Butaeva, Steven Durlauf, and Alexander Shapoval
Topics: Economic Mobility & Poverty