We study the impacts of a reform to parole supervision in Illinois. The reform reduced the term of supervision for some parolees from 12 months to 6 months. Using a standard difference-in-differences estimator, we find clear evidence that the reform reduced prison re-entry rates. Sharp drops in technical revocation rates drove these reductions. Rates of prison re-admissions linked to new crimes did not change. Cook County court records also show no evidence that the reform increased crime rates among parolees. The reform reduced both the cost of incarceration and the cost of parolee supervision without creating measurable harms to public safety. We develop a conceptual framework that shows how shorter terms of supervision could reduce rates of criminal activity among returning citizens, and we show how the insights of this framework inform on-going debates in many jurisdictions about the policies that govern parole supervision.

More on this topic

BFI Working Paper·Oct 21, 2026

What Can (and Cannot) Be Learned about Systemic Racial Discrimination from Randomized Controlled Trials?

Dania V. Francis, Rob Gillezeau, Damon Jones, and Angelino C. G. Viceisza
Topics: Economic Mobility & Poverty
BFI Working Paper·Oct 14, 2026

Indirect Variational Inference: Applications to Earnings Dynamics

Neele L. Balke, Stéphane Bonhomme, and Thibaut Lamadon
Topics: Economic Mobility & Poverty, Employment & Wages
BFI Working Paper·Oct 12, 2026

Gains from Trade in Gun Policy: A Compensation-Based Benchmark

Brad Shapiro, Sara Drango, and Sarah Moshary
Topics: Fiscal Studies, Health care