Using rich data on Chinese schoolchildren, we study the relationships of IQ and personality traits with children’s risk preferences and how they affect the precision with which those preferences are measured. Our structural model separates preferences from deliberation noise and guessing, and relates guessing to deliberation noise. Psychological measures have weak direct influences on preferences but strongly affect deliberation noise and guessing behavior. Shocks to choice have persistent individual-specific components and are not independent. Socioeconomic background has little direct influence on preferences or deliberation noise once traits are accounted for. Background variables affect psychological traits, however. Risk preferences differ across and within genders. For small gambles, girls are less risk averse than boys, but the opposite holds for larger gambles.

More on this topic

BFI Working Paper·Jun 15, 2026

AI Diffusion Gaps: Unequal Integration of AI Across K-12 Schools

Christopher Campos and John Singleton
Topics: K-12 Education
BFI Working Paper·Mar 17, 2026

Who Gets What in Education: Can School Matching Improve Student Achievement?

Atila Abdulkadiroglu, Parag A. Pathak, and Christopher Walters
Topics: K-12 Education
BFI Working Paper·Mar 17, 2026

School Choice and Segregation: Evidence from the Oakland Unified School District

Jesse Rothstein, Ini Umosen, and Christopher Walters
Topics: K-12 Education