We conducted a nationwide field experiment in China to evaluate the direct and indirect impacts of assigning firms to public or private citizen appeals when they violate pollution standards. There are three main findings. First, public appeals to the regulator through social media substantially reduce violations and pollution emissions, while private appeals cause more modest environmental improvements. Second, public appeals appear to tilt regulators’ focus away from facilitating economic growth and toward avoiding pollution-induced public unrest. Third, pollution reductions by treated firms are not offset by control firms, based on randomly varying the proportion of treatment firms at the prefecture-level. 

INTERACTIVE MAP

 

More on this topic

BFI Working Paper·Oct 21, 2025

Option Value of Apex Predators: Evidence from a River Discontinuity

Eyal Frank, Anouch Missirian, Dominic P. Parker, and Jennifer L. Raynor
Topics: Energy & Environment
BFI Working Paper·Sep 30, 2025

Monotone Ecological Inference

Hadi Elzayn, Jacob Goldin, Cameron Guage, Daniel E. Ho, and Claire Morton
Topics: Energy & Environment
BFI Working Paper·Sep 18, 2025

The Five Shanghai Themes

Harald Uhlig
Topics: Economic Mobility & Poverty, Energy & Environment, Financial Markets, Health care