We examine the payoff performance, up to the end of 2013, of non-agency residential mortgage-backed securities (RMBS), issued up to 2008. We have created a new and detailed data set on the universe of non-agency residential mortgage backed securities, per carefully assembling source data from Bloomberg and other sources. We compare these payoffs to their ex-ante ratings as well as other characteristics. We establish seven facts. First, the bulk of these securities was rated AAA. Second, AAA securities did ok: on average, their total cumulated losses up to 2013 are 2.3 percent. Third, the subprime AAA-rated segment did particularly well. Fourth, later vintages did worse than earlier vintages, except for subprime AAA securities. Fifth, the bulk of the losses were concentrated on a small share of all securities. Sixth, the misrating for AAA securities was modest. Seventh, controlling for a home price bust, a home price boom was good for the repayment on these securities. Together, these facts challenge the conventional narrative, that improper ratings of RMBS were a major factor in the financial crisis of 2008.

More on this topic

BFI Working Paper·Oct 7, 2025

Bond-Stock Comovements

John Y. Campbell, Carolin Pflueger, and Luis M. Viceira
Topics: Fiscal Studies
BFI Working Paper·Sep 8, 2025

Firms have Partial Knowledge: Evidence From a Reform

Avner Strulov-Shlain
Topics: Fiscal Studies
BFI Working Paper·Aug 26, 2025

Differential Validity in Fair Lending

Spencer Caro, Talia Gillis, and Scott Nelson
Topics: Fiscal Studies