We study how an automating technology affects career dynamics, human capital, and welfare in an economy where workers acquire skill through the tasks they perform. In a continuous-time general equilibrium model, learning-by-doing is determined jointly with the share of tasks automated, the frontier of tasks managers maintain, and the worker-to-manager career transition. Economies with high learning capacity admit pairs of stationary equilibria strictly ranked by the aggregate learning rate. Cheaper technology has opposite effects across the two: in the high-learning equilibrium, it raises welfare through the learning channel itself; in the low-learning equilibrium, it tips the economy into a human-capital trap. The planner’s first-best combines a tax on automation profits with a subsidy on frontier-maintenance expenditures at a common rate.

More on this topic

BFI Working Paper·Aug 27, 2026

Artificial Intelligence and Political Advice

Georgy Egorov and Konstantin Sonin
Topics: Technology & Innovation
BFI Working Paper·Aug 25, 2026

When the Middle Class Undermines Progress: The Political Economy of AI Regulation

Anna Denisenko and Konstantin Sonin
Topics: Technology & Innovation
BFI Working Paper·Jul 15, 2026

Assessing the Benefits of Optimized Agentic AI Systems for Asset Pricing

Ralph Koijen and Bradford Levy
Topics: Technology & Innovation