This chapter synthesizes and critically reviews the modern instrumental variables (IV) literature that allows for unobserved heterogeneity in treatment effects (UHTE). We start by discussing why UHTE is often an essential aspect of IV applications in economics and we explain the conceptual challenges raised by allowing for it. Then we review and survey two general strategies for incorporating UHTE. The first strategy is to continue to use linear IV estimators designed for classical constant (homogeneous) treatment effect models, acknowledge their likely misspecification, and attempt to reverse engineer an attractive interpretation in the presence of UHTE. This strategy commonly leads to interpretations of linear IV that involve local average treatment effects (LATEs). We review the various ways in which the use and justification of LATE interpretations have expanded and contracted since their introduction in the early 1990s. The second strategy is to forward engineer new estimators that explicitly allow for UHTE. This strategy has its roots in the Gronau-Heckman selection model of the 1970s, ideas from which have been revitalized through marginal treatment effects (MTE) analysis. We discuss implementation of MTE methods and draw connections with related control function and bounding methods that are scattered throughout the econometric and causal inference literature.

More on this topic

BFI Working Paper·Feb 5, 2025

Goals, Expectations, and Performance

Avner Strulov-Shlain and Alexandra Steiny Wellsjo
Topics: Uncategorized
BFI Working Paper·Jan 13, 2025

Large Language Models: An Applied Econometric Framework

Jens Ludwig, Sendhil Mullainathan, and Ashesh Rambachan
Topics: Uncategorized
BFI Working Paper·Jan 6, 2025

Embedded Culture as a Source of Comparative Advantage

Luigi Guiso, Paola Sapienza, and Luigi Zingales
Topics: Uncategorized