Policymakers are increasingly turning to insights gained from the experimental method as a means to inform large scale public policies. Critics view this increased usage as premature, pointing to the fact that many experimentally-tested programs fail to deliver their promise at scale. Under this view, the experimental approach drives too much public policy. Yet, if policymakers could be more confident that the original research findings would be delivered at scale, even the staunchest critics would carve out a larger role for experiments to inform policy. Leveraging the economic framework of Al-Ubaydli et al. (2019), we put forward 12 simple proposals, spanning researchers, policymakers, funders, and stakeholders, which together tackle the most vexing scalability threats. The framework highlights that only after we deepen our understanding of the scale up problem will we be on solid ground to argue that scientific experiments should hold a more prominent place in the policymaker’s quiver.

More on this topic

BFI Working Paper·Jan 21, 2026

Rational Disagreement

Nabil I. Al-Najjar and Harald Uhlig
Topics: Uncategorized
BFI Working Paper·Jan 6, 2026

Biases in Belief Updating Within and Across Domains

Francesca Bastianello and Alex Imas
Topics: Uncategorized
BFI Working Paper·Oct 31, 2025

Simplicity and Portability in Mechanism Design: A Case for (and Against) the Worst Case

Benjamin Brooks and Songzi Du
Topics: Uncategorized