We show that the largest increase in unemployment benefits in U.S. history had large spending impacts and small job-finding impacts. This finding has three implications. First, increased benefits were important for explaining aggregate spending dynamics—but not employment dynamics—during the pandemic. Second, benefit expansions allow us to study the MPC of normally low liquidity households in a high-liquidity state. These households still have high MPCs. This suggests a role for permanent behavioral characteristics, rather than just current liquidity, in driving spending behavior. Third, the mechanisms driving our results imply that temporary benefit supplements are a promising countercyclical tool.

More on this topic

BFI Working Paper·Oct 14, 2026

Indirect Variational Inference: Applications to Earnings Dynamics

Neele L. Balke, Stéphane Bonhomme, and Thibaut Lamadon
Topics: Economic Mobility & Poverty, Employment & Wages
BFI Working Paper·Oct 9, 2026

The Gendered Impacts of Perceived Skin Tone: Evidence from African American Siblings in 1870–1940

Ran Abramitzky, Jacob Conway, Roy Mill, and Luke C.D. Stein
Topics: Economic Mobility & Poverty, Employment & Wages
BFI Working Paper·Oct 6, 2026

Consumption, Savings, and Earnings Responses to Financial Windfalls

Rajashri Chakrabarti, Philippe d'Astous, Kory Kroft, Sheisha Kulkarni, Vyacheslav Mikhed, Matthew Notowidigdo, Sahil Raina, and Barry Scholnick
Topics: Employment & Wages