We compare the lending technology of direct lenders, banks, and finance companies using a unique data set on secured borrowing by the universe of U.S.-based private middle market firms. The borrowers of direct lenders are distinct relative to those of traditional lenders; they are younger, more likely to be in intangible capital industries, and more likely to be located in the biggest cities in the United States. These differences reflect the focus of direct lenders on private equity-owned firms; direct lenders have negligible impact in industries and cities with low private equity presence. The lending technology of direct lenders is distinct from banks: they have almost no branch network, they are geographically distant from borrowers, they write collateral claims more focused on the continuation value of firms after a default, and they have a higher degree of specialization in certain industries. Direct lenders and private equity sponsors match on industry specialization more strongly than geographic proximity. The findings suggest that direct lenders are not a general substitute for traditional lenders in middle market business lending, but they are instead specialized lenders focused on a particular segment of the U.S. economy with a distinct lending technology.

More on this topic

BFI Working Paper·Jan 7, 2026

The Impacts of Parole Supervision

Luke Brinkman, Andrew Jordan, and Derek Neal
Topics: Economic Mobility & Poverty, Fiscal Studies
BFI Working Paper·Oct 21, 2025

Jealousy of Trade: Exclusionary Preferences and Economic Nationalism

Alex Imas, Kristóf Madarász, and Heather Sarsons
Topics: Fiscal Studies
BFI Working Paper·Oct 21, 2025

Who Pays for Tariffs Along the Supply Chain? Evidence from European Wine Tariffs

Aaron B. Flaaen, Ali Hortaçsu, Felix Tintelnot, Nicolás Urdaneta, and Daniel Xu
Topics: Fiscal Studies, Industrial Organization