We demonstrate the importance of distinguishing between the traditional use of labor for production, versus alternative uses of labor for overhead, marketing and other expansionary activities, for studying the distribution of both factor income and labor income. We use our framework to assess the impact of changes in markups on the overall labor share and on labor income inequality across occupations. We identify the production and expansionary content of different occupations from the co-movement of occupational income shares with markup-induced changes in the labor share. We find that around one-fifth of US labor income compensates expansionary activities, and that occupations with larger expansionary content have experienced the fastest wage and employment growth since 1980. Our framework can rationalize a counter-cyclical labor share in the presence of sticky prices and can be used to study the distributional effects of demand shocks, monetary policy and secular changes in competition.

More on this topic

BFI Working Paper·Feb 18, 2026

Trading Goods for Lives: NAFTA’s Mortality Impacts and Implications

Amy Finkelstein, Matthew Notowidigdo, and Steven Shi
Topics: Employment & Wages
BFI Working Paper·Feb 10, 2026

The Effect of Exposure: Evidence from Spatial Choices in Nairobi

Joshua Dean, Gabriel Kreindler, and Oluchi Mbonu
Topics: Employment & Wages
BFI Working Paper·Feb 2, 2026

Managers and the Cultural Transmission of Gender Norms

Virginia Minni, Kieu-Trang Nguyen, Heather Sarsons, and Carla Srebot
Topics: Employment & Wages