We develop a framework for welfare analysis of interventions designed to increase take-up of social safety net programs in the presence of potential behavioral biases. We calibrate the key parameters using a randomized field experiment in which 30,000 elderly individuals not enrolled in—but likely eligible for—the Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program (SNAP) are either provided with information that they are likely eligible, provided with this information and offered assistance in applying, or are in a “status quo” control group. Only 6% of the control group enrolls in SNAP over the next nine months, compared to 11% of the Information Only group and 18% of the Information Plus Assistance group. The individuals who apply or enroll in response to either intervention have higher net income and are less sick than the average enrollee in the control group. We present evidence consistent with the existence of optimization frictions that are greater for needier individuals, which suggests that the poor targeting properties of the interventions reduce their welfare benefits.

View Journal Publication

More on this topic

BFI Working Paper·Jun 18, 2025

Innovator Networks Within the Firm and the Quality of Innovation

Michael Gibbs, Friederike Mengel, and Christoph Siemroth
Topics: Uncategorized
BFI Working Paper·Jun 17, 2025

The Social Desirability Atlas

Leonardo Bursztyn, Ingar K. Haaland, Nicolas Röver, and Christopher Roth
Topics: Uncategorized
BFI Working Paper·Jun 10, 2025

Measuring Markets for Network Goods

Leonardo Bursztyn, Matthew Gentzkow, Rafael Jiménez-Durán, Aaron Leonard, Filip Milojević, and Christopher Roth
Topics: Uncategorized