When leaders face threats to their authority, escalating foreign conflict can help divert public attention away from domestic grievances. We develop a formal microfoundation for diversionary escalation rooted in a theory of regime change. Although the idea of diversionary escalation is classic, systematic quantitative evidence has been challeng-ing to obtain. Using a new data set of 1.8 million conflict incidents, obtained from the Organization for Security and Co-operation in Europe’s (OSCE) Special Monitoring Mission to Ukraine in 2015–2022, we find evidence that the Russian government strategically employed proxy-initiated separatist violence in Eastern Ukraine to divert attention from domestic unrest and opposition-led protest. We also find a positive link between opposition protest and inflammatory anti-Ukrainian coverage in the Russian media, complementary to battlefield escalation.

More on this topic

BFI Working Paper·Jan 26, 2026

Never Enough: Dynamic Status Incentives in Organizations

Leonardo Bursztyn, Ewan Rawcliffe, and Hans-Joachim Voth
Topics: Uncategorized
BFI Working Paper·Jan 21, 2026

Rational Disagreement

Nabil I. Al-Najjar and Harald Uhlig
Topics: Uncategorized
BFI Working Paper·Jan 6, 2026

Biases in Belief Updating Within and Across Domains

Francesca Bastianello and Alex Imas
Topics: Uncategorized