How do agents respond to policy when investments have high up-front costs and lasting payoffs? We estimate farmers’ short- and long-run responses to changes in groundwater pumping costs in California—where perennial crops with these features are prevalent—using both fixed effects and dynamic discrete choice models that leverage quasi-experimental variation. In the short run, farmers’ groundwater demand elasticity is −0.76, and they do not change crops. In contrast, the long-run elasticity is −0.38, driven in part by meaningful reductions in water-intensive perennial cropping. Meeting California’s sustainability targets would require reallocation of 9% of acres, including a 50% increase in fallowing.

More on this topic

BFI Working Paper·Jan 6, 2026

Green Waste

Ingvil Gaarder, Morten Grindaker, Tom G. Meling, and Magne Mogstad
Topics: Energy & Environment
BFI Working Paper·Jan 6, 2026

Renewable Energy Expansion: Key Challenges and Emerging Opportunities

Koichiro Ito
Topics: Energy & Environment
BFI Working Paper·Oct 21, 2025

Option Value of Apex Predators: Evidence from a River Discontinuity

Eyal Frank, Anouch Missirian, Dominic P. Parker, and Jennifer L. Raynor
Topics: Energy & Environment