The public debate over disability insurance has centered on concerns about individuals without severe health conditions receiving benefits. We go beyond health risk alone to quantify the overall insurance value of U.S. disability programs, including value from insuring non-health risk. We find that disability recipients, especially those with less-severe health conditions, are much more likely to have experienced a wide variety of non-health shocks than non-recipients. Selection into disability receipt on the basis of non-health shocks is so strong among individuals with less-severe health conditions that by many measures less-severe recipients are worse off than more-severe recipients. As a result, under baseline assumptions, benefits to less-severe recipients have an annual surplus value (insurance benefit less efficiency cost) over cost-equivalent tax cuts of $7,700 per recipient, about three-fourths that of benefits to more-severe recipients ($9,900). Insurance against non-health risk accounts for about one-half of the value of U.S. disability programs.

More on this topic

BFI Working Paper·Jun 10, 2026

The Enjoyment Paradox: College-Educated Mothers Invest More in Their Children’s Learning and Enjoy It Less

Ariel Kalil, Haoxuan Liu, and Ritika Sethi
Topics: Early Childhood Education, Employment & Wages, Higher Education & Workforce Training
BFI Working Paper·May 28, 2026

Explaining the Historical Rise and Recent Decline in Social Security Disability Insurance Enrollment

Manasi Deshpande, Maxwell Kellogg, Magne Mogstad, and Kuan-Ju Tseng
Topics: Employment & Wages
BFI Working Paper·Apr 29, 2026

Intermediate Input Prices and the Labor Share

Juanma Castro-Vincenzi and Benny Kleinman
Topics: Employment & Wages