People can only do so much. When confronted with scarcity, including money or friendships among other concerns, people naturally tend to focus on those shortages, which can lead to inattention to other important matters. For parents struggling to meet such shortfalls, this inattention can redound to their children. More broadly, this “scarcity mindset” can lead to poor decision-making on actions with long-term consequences, thus perpetuating a “scarcity trap.”

To examine this phenomenon, the authors focus on two types of scarcity relevant to the COVID-19 pandemic in the lives of parents with young children: financial scarcity, subjectively defined as insufficient funds at the end of the month to meet basic needs; and social scarcity, or people’s subjective sense of loneliness. The authors examine data collected from low-income parents of preschool-age children and from the directors of those children’s preschool centers, which closed March 17, 2020, due to a statewide stay-at-home order. 

In particular, the authors study the degree to which parents were aware of information they received from the preschool centers, which the authors analyze vis a vis parents’ reports of financial scarcity and loneliness, to find the following:

  • Financial and social connections scarcity are significantly positively associated with inattention.
  • Further, financial scarcity and loneliness are largely independent phenomena and have roughly equivalent impacts on inattention.
  • Specifically, parents who report a financial or social scarcity mindset are 63 percent more likely than their counterparts to be inattentive to information that was sent by the schools about resources to help them during the COVID-19 pandemic.

This work contributes to the nascent body of literature that highlights the role of resource scarcity in individuals’ cognitive attention. For example, a large literature discusses why people fail to act on information even when they attend to it because of present bias and other cognitive biases. However, if people do not even attend to information (as it was provided) when they are experiencing scarcity, suboptimal behavioral choice will remain a problem. The authors acknowledge that information alone is rarely enough to motivate behavior change, but information is often a key first step, and understanding people’s mindsets is important in effecting change.

More on this topic

Podcasts episode·Oct 7, 2025

The Economics of Early Childhood: Why the First Five Years Matter Most

Tess Vigeland and James Heckman
Nobel laureate James Heckman explains why ages zero to five are critical for brain development and lifelong outcomes. He discusses the Perry Preschool Program’s surprising health benefits 35 years later, why low-cost home-visiting programs that engage parents outperform expensive institutional...
Topics: Early Childhood Education
Podcasts episode·Jul 22, 2025

Decoding Educational Content: A Computational Comparison Between Public and Religious School Textbooks

Tess Vigeland and Anjali Adukia
Textbooks don’t just teach facts, they shape how children understand the world and their place in it. In this episode, UChicago economist Anjali Adukia discusses her study of textbooks across public schools, religious private schools, and homeschools. Using advanced AI...
Topics: Early Childhood Education
Research Briefs·Apr 23, 2024

Early Predictors of Racial Disparities in Criminal Justice Involvement

Andrew Jordan, Ezra Karger, and Derek Neal
Detailed measures of early academic achievement and socioeconomic status are powerful predictors of future criminal justice involvement; however, while reforms that improve school quality and neighborhood environments are likely to reduce future racial disparities in criminal justice involvement, such improvements...
Topics: Early Childhood Education, Economic Mobility & Poverty, Higher Education & Workforce Training