We study the distributional consequences of student debt forgiveness in present value terms, accounting for differences in repayment behavior across the earnings distribution. Full or partial forgiveness is regressive because high earners took larger loans, but also because, for low earners, balances greatly overstate present values. Consequently, forgiveness would benefit the top decile as much as the bottom three deciles combined. Blacks and Hispanics would also benefit substantially less than balances suggest. Enrolling households who would benefit from income-driven repayment is the least expensive and most progressive policy we consider.


More on this topic

BFI Working Paper·Jan 27, 2026

College Major Choice, Payoffs, and Gender Gaps

Christopher Campos, Pablo Muñoz, Alonso Bucarey, and Dante Contreras
Topics: Higher Education & Workforce Training
BFI Working Paper·Jan 26, 2026

A Few Bad Apples? Academic Dishonesty, Political Selection, and Institutional Performance in China

Zhuang Liu, Wenwei Peng, and Shaoda Wang
Topics: Higher Education & Workforce Training
BFI Working Paper·Jan 9, 2026

The Lending Technology of Direct Lenders in Private Credit

Young Soo Jang, Dasol Kim, and Amir Sufi
Topics: Fiscal Studies