We study the distributional consequences of student debt forgiveness in present value terms, accounting for differences in repayment behavior across the earnings distribution. Full or partial forgiveness is regressive because high earners took larger loans, but also because, for low earners, balances greatly overstate present values. Consequently, forgiveness would benefit the top decile as much as the bottom three deciles combined. Blacks and Hispanics would also benefit substantially less than balances suggest. Enrolling households who would benefit from income-driven repayment is the least expensive and most progressive policy we consider.


More on this topic

BFI Working Paper·Mar 18, 2026

Stimulating Auto Markets

David W. Berger, Geoffrey Gee, Nick Turner, and Eric Zwick
Topics: Fiscal Studies
BFI Working Paper·Mar 17, 2026

Household Preferences for Women’s Employment: A Field Experiment in Bangladesh

Yueh-ya Hsu, Reshmaan N. Hussam, Erin M. Kelley, and Gregory Lane
Topics: Economic Mobility & Poverty, Employment & Wages, Higher Education & Workforce Training
BFI Working Paper·Mar 16, 2026

Attention (And Money) Is All You Need: Why Universities Are Struggling to Keep AI Talent

Ufuk Akcigit, Craig A. Chikis, Emin Dinlersoz, and Nathan Goldschlag
Topics: Higher Education & Workforce Training, Technology & Innovation