We study how an automating technology affects career dynamics, human capital, and welfare in an economy where workers acquire skill through the tasks they perform. In a continuous-time general equilibrium model, learning-by-doing is determined jointly with the share of tasks automated, the frontier of tasks managers maintain, and the worker-to-manager career transition. Economies with high learning capacity admit pairs of stationary equilibria strictly ranked by the aggregate learning rate. Cheaper technology has opposite effects across the two: in the high-learning equilibrium, it raises welfare through the learning channel itself; in the low-learning equilibrium, it tips the economy into a human-capital trap. The planner’s first-best combines a tax on automation profits with a subsidy on frontier-maintenance expenditures at a common rate.

More on this topic

BFI Working Paper·May 12, 2026

Data Centers and Local Economies in the Age of AI: A Shift–Share Approach

Fernando Alvarez, David Argente, Joyce Chow, and Diana Van Patten
Topics: Technology & Innovation
BFI Working Paper·May 5, 2026

Technology Adoption and Optimal Policy

Fernando Alvarez, Francisco J. Buera, and Nicholas Trachter
Topics: Technology & Innovation
BFI Working Paper·Apr 27, 2026

Why Bans Fail: Tipping Points and Australia’s Social Media Ban

Leonardo Bursztyn, Angela Duckworth, Rafael Jiménez-Durán, Aaron Leonard, Filip Milojević, Christopher Roth, and Cass R. Sunstein
Topics: Technology & Innovation