We study optimal policy in a dynamic general equilibrium model where heterogeneous monopolistic competitive firms pay a fixed cost to adopt a frontier technology that grows exogenously. Using Mean Field Games tools, we show that the optimal policy consists of exactly two time-invariant subsidies: one correcting the static misallocation from market power, and one correcting the dynamic under-incentive to adopt. This holds outside of balanced growth paths, for any initial distribution of technology gaps. We analyze a simplified version of the model that aggregates to a Neoclassical Growth Model with an S-shaped production function whenever complementarities are strong, and fully characterize when the optimal policy uniquely implements the first best. When it does not, two novel results emerge: the efficient allocation prescribes escaping a poverty trap—providing an explicit optimality foundation for a Big Push—and, more surprisingly, escaping an abundance trap, where dismantling adopted technologies is optimal. In both cases, a temporary, costless supplementary policy restores unique implementation.

More on this topic

BFI Working Paper·May 12, 2026

Data Centers and Local Economies in the Age of AI: A Shift–Share Approach

Fernando Alvarez, David Argente, Joyce Chow, and Diana Van Patten
Topics: Technology & Innovation
BFI Working Paper·May 5, 2026

Automation, Learning, and Career Dynamics

Hassan Afrouzi, Andres Blanco, Andrés Drenik, and Erik Hurst
Topics: Technology & Innovation
BFI Working Paper·Apr 27, 2026

Why Bans Fail: Tipping Points and Australia’s Social Media Ban

Leonardo Bursztyn, Angela Duckworth, Rafael Jiménez-Durán, Aaron Leonard, Filip Milojević, Christopher Roth, and Cass R. Sunstein
Topics: Technology & Innovation