We study optimal policy in a dynamic general equilibrium model where heterogeneous monopolistic competitive firms pay a fixed cost to adopt a frontier technology that grows exogenously. Using Mean Field Games tools, we show that the optimal policy consists of exactly two time-invariant subsidies: one correcting the static misallocation from market power, and one correcting the dynamic under-incentive to adopt. This holds outside of balanced growth paths, for any initial distribution of technology gaps. We analyze a simplified version of the model that aggregates to a Neoclassical Growth Model with an S-shaped production function whenever complementarities are strong, and fully characterize when the optimal policy uniquely implements the first best. When it does not, two novel results emerge: the efficient allocation prescribes escaping a poverty trap—providing an explicit optimality foundation for a Big Push—and, more surprisingly, escaping an abundance trap, where dismantling adopted technologies is optimal. In both cases, a temporary, costless supplementary policy restores unique implementation.

More on this topic

BFI Working Paper·Oct 6, 2026

Do AI Assistants Reinforce Investor Beliefs? Evidence from Human and AI Replies

Swaminathan Balasubramaniam, Jorge Sabat, and Soumyajit Ray
Topics: Technology & Innovation
BFI Working Paper·Oct 6, 2026

Capital-Skill Complementarity Beyond Firm Boundaries

Gert Bijnens, Anders Humlum, and Stijn Vanormelingen
Topics: Employment & Wages, Technology & Innovation
BFI Working Paper·Oct 6, 2026

Aligning Platform and User Incentives in Social Media Age Restrictions

Leonardo Bursztyn, Rafael Jiménez-Durán, Aaron Leonard, Filip Milojević, and Christopher Roth
Topics: Technology & Innovation