Armed groups routinely delegate domains of rule to pre-existing village chiefs—indirect rule. The larger a village chief’s power over the villagers relative to the group’s, the more there is indirect rule. Over time, enabled by the chief’s efforts to legitimize the group, the group expands the taxes they collect themselves in addition to those collected by the chief for them and substitutes the chief for justice administration—converging to direct rule. This suggests indirect rule is a temporary arrangement by uninformed or illegitimate rulers with an inherent agency problem, overcome when rulers acquire enough skill to replace local elites.

More on this topic

BFI Working Paper·Jul 22, 2024

Seeing like a Citizen: Experimental Evidence on How Empowerment Affects Engagement with the State

Soeren J. Henn, Laura Paler, Wilson Prichard, Cyrus Samii and Raul Sanchez de la Sierra
Topics: Uncategorized
BFI Working Paper·Jul 22, 2024

Anti-Social Norms

Leopoldo Fergusson, José-Alberto Guerra and James Robinson
Topics: Uncategorized
BFI Working Paper·Jul 11, 2024

Identifying Agglomeration Shadows: Long-run Evidence from Ancient Ports

Richard Hornbeck, Guy Michaels and Ferdinand Rauch
Topics: Uncategorized