This article draws lessons from the business support policies pursued in the COVID-19 pandemic to guide policy design for the next disaster. We contrast the performance of the Paycheck Protection Program to the Main Street Lending Program to illustrate how design principles—targeting, repayment terms, and deployment through the banks versus government agencies—affect policy outcomes. We develop a framework for understanding why a novel business support policy could usefully complement traditional support programs. One surprising insight that emerges from this analysis is that many of the market failures used to justify support during the pandemic also arise in “garden-variety” recessions. Given our framework, the policy case for small business support during the recovery is considerably weaker than during the disaster, though credit policies that promote firm entry could aid the reallocation process.

This paper was prepared for the Economic Strategy Group at the Aspen Institute.

More on this topic

BFI Working Paper·Sep 23, 2024

Investing in Vaccines to Mitigate Harm from COVID-19 and Future Pandemics

Rachel Glennerster, Catherine Che, Sarrin M. Chethik, Claire McMahon, and Christopher Snyder
Topics: COVID-19, Health care
BFI Working Paper·Jul 29, 2024

Employee Innovation During Office Work, Work from Home and Hybrid Work

Michael Gibbs, Friederike Mengel, and Christoph Siemroth
Topics: COVID-19, Employment & Wages
BFI Working Paper·May 7, 2024

Return to Office and the Tenure Distribution

David Van Dijcke, Florian Gunsilius, and Austin Wright
Topics: COVID-19, Employment & Wages